Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOAR FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

HD
Docket No. NR&961-14
16 April 2015

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj : Sa ea -
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ret: fa} TO U,8.€. L552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 24 Jul 14 w/attachments
(2) HOMC JPL memo dtd 13 Jan 15
(3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 9 Mar 15

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative

Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011.

  
 

Copies of the contested entries are at Tabs A and B, respectively.

2. The Board, consisting

reviewed Petitioner's A ecieioes & rer and ‘injustice on

16 April 2015, and pursuant to LES erections determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

 

|
|:
|

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosures (2) and (3), the
Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the subject

 

ee
matter of Petitioner’s case have commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

c. The page 11 on which the contested entry dated 11 March 2009
appears also includes an uncontested entry.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the
existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated

11 March 2009.. This is to be accomplished by reconstructing the page
11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the entry
so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through it.

Di. That his record be corrected further by removing the page
11 entry dated 11 August 2011. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, oF
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather than
merely lining through it.

Bus That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
For Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regul ations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
ovisions, it is hereby announced that the

ken under the authority of reference
etary of the

compliance with its pr
foregoing corrective action ta
(a) has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secr

Navy. 4,
Y ib Wr l

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09

    Original file (02283-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14

    Original file (NR3392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7703 14

    Original file (NR7703 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR7703-14 9 April 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: ; _ ra REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1970)”} entry dated 16 January 2009. k copy of the contested entry is at...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14

    Original file (NR9378 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5548 14

    Original file (NR5548 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 16 January, 19 Pebruary,,amd-18 March 2003 (copies at Tab A). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 16 January and 19...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05028-12

    Original file (05028-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 11 June 2008 and the page 11(a) entry dated 14 October 2009, copies of which are at enclosure (1). That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08

    Original file (12164-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...